Someone has to tell the immortals they’re wrong.A mortal law student challenges a ruling from an immortal tribunal whose authority reaches across kings, nations and civilizations. One human argument presses against the power to judge everyone else—and the assumption of having the last word.
A mortal law student challenges a ruling made by an immortal tribunal whose authority extends over kings, nations and civilizations. To contest the decision, the student must confront the rules and precedents that give the court its power, carrying an argument beyond the reach of ordinary justice. The judges can outlive those affected by their rulings, but that does not settle whether they are right. A dispute over one judgment becomes a test of whether even this court can be required to answer for the authority it exercises.
Someone has to tell the immortals they’re wrong.
Ori Refael PeretzConcept in development
02IvoryOri Refael Peretz
A mortal argument before immortal judges.
The law student challenges a ruling through the rules and precedents supporting the tribunal’s authority. The judges can outlive the kings, nations and civilizations affected by their decisions. That distance makes the dispute a question of accountability as well as an argument over one judgment.
Someone has to tell the immortals they’re wrong.
Ori Refael PeretzConcept in development
03IvoryOri Refael Peretz
Who can require the tribunal to answer?
The tribunal’s reach extends beyond ordinary justice, but endurance does not establish that a ruling is right. The student’s challenge asks whether the court can be made to justify its exercise of power. The case brings a mortal demand for reasons before judges who stand above mortal institutions.
Someone has to tell the immortals they’re wrong.
Ori Refael PeretzConcept in development
The catalogueSomeone has to tell the immortals they’re wrong.Concept in development
Inside the story
A mortal challenge to immortal judgment.
A mortal law student challenges a ruling made by an immortal tribunal whose authority extends over kings, nations and civilizations. To contest the decision, the student must confront the rules and precedents that give the court its power, carrying an argument beyond the reach of ordinary justice.
Challenging the court
The judges can outlive those affected by their rulings, but that does not settle whether they are right. A dispute over one judgment becomes a test of whether even this court can be required to answer for the authority it exercises.
Detail from the cover concept
The visual identity
Power, framed in light.
Pale columns encircle a central dais beneath an open sky. The chamber is empty, letting its scale and symmetry carry the sense of authority.
